↩ 返回宣言Back to the manifesto · RENASCIENCE 投稿Submit

《新科学》 RenaScience // 创刊号征稿RenaScience // Inaugural issue · call for contributions

为想法办
一本杂志A magazine
for ideas

我们不征集论文，而是征集想法：原创的观点，独家的数据和材料。编辑会和 AI 一起，与你反复讨论，把它做成网站上的多模态策展页面和杂志里生动有趣的文章。论文可以附上，但它不是门票。We do not call for papers; we call for ideas: original arguments, and data and materials that no one else has. The editors, working with AI, will go over it with you and turn it into a multimodal curated page on the website and a lively article in the magazine. You may attach a paper, but a paper is not the ticket in.

直接投稿Submit now ↓ 征稿须知The call ↓ 创刊词Editorial ↓ 创刊号《科学的复兴》Inaugural issue: The Renaissance of Science ↗

创刊号主题Theme of the inaugural issue“新时代的科研范式”“The research paradigm of a new era”

  1. 01科学的初心The heart of science
  2. 02科学的危机Science in crisis
  3. 03可感的科学Science you can feel
  4. 04科学新前沿New frontiers

01创刊词Editorial

1665 年 1 月，巴黎出了一份《学者杂志》；两个月后，伦敦皇家学会的秘书奥尔登堡印出了第一期《哲学汇刊》。在那之前，学者之间靠书信交换消息：谁做了什么实验，谁见到了什么怪事，谁有一个还没想清楚的猜想。期刊把这些书信变成了印刷品，替学者做四件事：登记谁先发现，把发现传播出去，给它一个初步的认证，再把它存档。

三百多年后，期刊成了论文的容器，论文成了学术的计量单位。职称、经费和名声，都按篇数和刊物的级别折算。论文本来是装想法的盒子，后来人们买椟还珠，只看重发表了几个“盒子”。有时候为了提升发表量，宁可把完整的想法拆碎。

今天，盒子变得廉价了。AI 几分钟就能写出一篇像模像样的论文，审稿人被淹没，读者也被淹没。但想法没有变得廉价。真正稀缺的，是一个好问题，一组只有你手里才有的数据，一次亲手做过的实验，一段在田野、档案馆或诊室里的观察，一个只有跨行的人才看得见的联系。这样的东西，很多从来没有变成论文：作者没有时间，没有职位，不熟悉格式，或者找不到愿意刊登的期刊。于是它们留在抽屉里、硬盘里和饭桌上的闲聊里，慢慢消失了。

所以，这本杂志不征集论文，而是征集想法。论文当然也可以附上，但它不是门票。你只要把想法说清楚，把手里的数据和材料交给我们；编辑会和 AI 一起，进一步讨论和展开你的观点，帮你提炼思想、核对事实、补上文献、画成图表、生成视频，必要时向你提出采访，最后做成一个适合各种读者的多模态策展页面：有人想看结论，有人想查证据，有人想看过程，有人想接着做，有人只想看看热闹，每个人都能找到自己的入口。

我们会把这些成果做成网页，发布在网站上，其中最有趣的，会收录到纸质杂志里。你提供作者署名，我们也会诚实记录编辑和 AI 的参与过程。

我们为什么还要印一本纸质杂志？

第一个理由是兼容。旧的同行评议制度，包括发表与引用体系仍然有意义，我们无意推翻它。纸质版有卷期号和页码，每篇文章都附上推荐的引用格式；网站上的每一篇都有稳定的网址和版本号。它们可以被论文引用，也可以写进简历。一个想法在这里发表，并不妨碍它日后形成一篇正式的论文发表到别处。

第二个理由是好玩。纸是可以拿在手里、可以收藏的东西。我们希望一本科学杂志也能像潮流杂志、游戏设定集或唱片封套那样被人翻来翻去：有版画和信息图，有实验现场，有人与 AI 一起做研究的战报，也有读者的提问和接力。科学可以更酷、更潮、更有趣。

所以，热闹之外，这本杂志守三条规矩：证据，可以点开；成果，有人讲得清；AI，写在明处。门槛降低的是操作，不是标准。一个没有学位的爱好者，只要证据扎实、讲得清楚，就和教授坐在同一张桌子前；一位教授如果拿不出证据，头衔也替他说不了话。

创刊号的开篇，是我的宣言《科学的复兴》。它讲的是：近两百年来，科学越来越专业，越来越像一份职业，求知的乐趣被流水线、论文计数和知识的洪水挤到了一边；AI 是第三重危机，也是转机。宣言之后，创刊号以“新时代的科研范式”为主题征稿，包括但不限于如下栏目：

  1. 一、科学的初心——科研的工具和制度应该顺应时代而变化，但我们需要坚守什么？复兴什么？什么是应当守护和发扬的“科学精神”？
  2. 二、科学的危机——当代的科研体制和科学文化的困境与危机有哪些？如何看待唯分数、唯论文、唯帽子等风气？学术界又在面临哪些新的挑战？
  3. 三、可感的科学——科学从来不是枯燥的文本堆砌，科学与艺术向来联系紧密，科学的可视化不仅承担着科学知识向大众传播的使命，更可能打开科学家的思路，促进跨学科的交流。本栏目旨在讨论科学可视化的案例和意义。
  4. 四、科学新前沿——当下的各科科学有哪些新的进展？有哪些正在被争论和探索的新观点或新方法？科研活动有哪些新态势？哪些跨学科领域颇有前景？科学的发展引发了哪些哲学或伦理的新问题？我们欢迎科学家投稿最新的想法，讲给跨学科研究者或普通公众听。

不需要完整的论文，只需要你有独创性的想法，独到的视角，独家的数据和材料，甚至独特的失败经历。

求知是人的本性。有人以此为业，更多的人以此为乐。这本杂志想做的，就是把科学还给好奇心：让有想法的人被看见，让好想法长出完整的身体，让更多的人上手玩，也让所有人都能当观众。

欢迎投稿。

胡翌霖 @ RenaSci
2026 年 10 月

In January 1665 the Journal des sçavans appeared in Paris; two months later Henry Oldenburg, secretary of the Royal Society in London, printed the first issue of the Philosophical Transactions. Before then, scholars traded news by letter: who had done which experiment, who had seen some strange thing, who had a conjecture not yet thought through. The journals turned those letters into print and did four jobs for scholars: they recorded who found something first, spread the finding, gave it a first certification and kept it in the archive.

More than three hundred years on, the journal has become a container for papers, and the paper has become the unit in which scholarship is measured. Promotions, grants and reputations are all converted into a count of papers and the rank of the journals that printed them. The paper was meant to be a box for ideas; in time, like the man in the old Chinese story who bought the jewel box and handed back the pearl, people came to care only about how many “boxes” they had published. Some would even break a complete idea into pieces to publish more.

Today the boxes have become cheap. AI can turn out a respectable-looking paper in a few minutes; reviewers are swamped, and so are readers. Ideas have not become cheap. What is truly scarce is a good question; a set of data that only you have; an experiment done with your own hands; an observation made in the field, the archive or the consulting room; a connection that only someone who crosses fields can see. Much of this never became a paper: its authors had no time, no position, no feel for the format, or could not find a journal willing to print it. So it stayed in drawers, on hard drives and in conversations over dinner, and slowly disappeared.

So this magazine does not call for papers; it calls for ideas. You are welcome to attach a paper, but a paper is not the ticket in. All you need to do is state your idea clearly and hand us the data and materials you have. The editors, working with AI, will discuss and develop your argument further: they will help you distil the thinking, check the facts, add the literature, draw the charts and make videos, ask to interview you where needed, and finally build a multimodal curated page that suits every kind of reader. Some want the conclusion, some want to check the evidence, some want to see the process, some want to carry the work on, and some just want to watch the show; each of them will find a way in.

We will turn this work into web pages and publish them on the website; the most interesting will go into the print magazine. You provide the author’s name, and we will keep an honest record of how the editors and AI took part.

Why print a magazine on paper at all?

The first reason is compatibility. The old system of peer review, including publication and citation, still has its point, and we have no wish to overturn it. The print edition has volume, issue and page numbers, and every article comes with a recommended citation; every piece on the website has a stable address and a version number. They can be cited in papers and listed on a CV. Publishing an idea here does not stop it from growing into a formal paper and being published elsewhere later.

The second reason is fun. Paper is something you can hold in your hands and keep. We want people to leaf through a science magazine the way they leaf through a style magazine, a game art book or a record sleeve: with engravings and infographics, scenes from the lab, battle reports from people doing research with AI, and readers’ questions and relays. Science can be cooler, more stylish and more fun.

So, beyond the buzz, this magazine keeps three rules: evidence you can open; results someone can explain; AI use in plain sight. What gets easier is the operation, not the standard. An amateur without a degree, if the evidence is solid and the explanation clear, sits at the same table as a professor; a professor who cannot produce the evidence will find that no title speaks for him.

The inaugural issue opens with my manifesto, The Renaissance of Science. Its argument is this: for nearly two centuries science has grown ever more specialized, ever more like a job, and the joy of knowing has been pushed aside by the assembly line, paper counting and a flood of knowledge; AI is the third crisis, and also the turning point. After the manifesto, the inaugural issue calls for contributions on the theme “The research paradigm of a new era”, in sections that include, but are not limited to, the following:

  1. The heart of science — The tools and institutions of research should change with the times, but what must we hold on to? What should we revive? What is the “scientific spirit” that deserves to be guarded and carried forward?
  2. Science in crisis — What predicaments and crises do today’s research system and scientific culture face? What should we make of judging people by scores alone, by papers alone, by honorific titles alone? What new challenges is the academic world facing?
  3. Science you can feel — Science has never been a dry pile of text, and it has always been close to art. Visualizing science does not only carry scientific knowledge to the public; it can also open up scientists’ thinking and foster exchange across disciplines. This section discusses cases of scientific visualization and what they mean.
  4. New frontiers — What is new in the sciences today? Which new ideas or methods are being debated and explored? What new trends are there in research itself? Which interdisciplinary fields look promising? What new philosophical or ethical questions has the progress of science raised? We welcome scientists’ latest ideas, told for researchers in other fields or for the general public.

You do not need a complete paper. All you need is an original idea, a perspective of your own, data and materials that no one else has, or even a failure that no one else has had.

All human beings by nature desire to know. Some make it their profession; many more do it for joy. What this magazine wants to do is give science back to curiosity: to let people with ideas be seen, to let good ideas grow a full body, to let more people get their hands on science, and to let everyone watch.

We look forward to your contributions.

Hu Yilin @ RenaSci
October 2026

02征稿须知Call for contributions

《新科学》（RenaScience）是一本关于科学的杂志，有网站版，也有纸质版。我们不征集论文（当然可以附上），而是征集想法：原创的观点，独家的数据和材料。编辑会和 AI 一起，与你反复讨论，把它提炼、查证、补充完整，做成网站上的多模态策展页面和杂志里生动有趣的文章。纸质版兼容现有的发表与引用体系，也想让科学用更酷、更潮、更有趣的方式传播。本须知长期有效，网址：renascience.com。

一、可以投什么

  • 一个想法：一个好问题、一个猜想、一个反常的现象、一个方法上的小发明、一个跨行才看得见的联系。说清楚就行，几百字也可以。
  • 独家的数据和材料：你自己采集的数据，实验记录、田野笔记、访谈、档案、照片、录音、视频、代码、模型；把公开的数据用出新花样，也欢迎。
  • 一段过程：你做研究的过程记录，包括和 AI 一起做研究的对话（我们叫它“战报”）、复现的尝试、走过的弯路。失败同样值得记录。
  • 一条策展的线索：一项值得重新讲述的已有成果，你自己的或别人的（请注明出处），以及你想怎样讲它。
  • 对已发表作品的回应：提问、质疑、复现、补充数据，或者接着往下做。
  • 论文：可以附带，不是必需。已经写成的论文，我们可以为它补上导读、数据、过程和图解。

我们特别欢迎学生、业余爱好者、跨行的人、工程师、医生、教师和退休的研究者，以及所有手里有好问题或好材料、却没有合适地方发表的人。

二、怎样投稿

请用一页纸说清楚这几件事：

  1. 用一段话简练地说出你的想法。
  2. 它为什么有意思：回答了什么问题，挑战了什么看法，或者好玩在哪里。
  3. 相关的思路、数据、材料、经历，标明独创性。
  4. 你希望怎样的美学风格和传播载体（如漫画、海报、短视频、长视频、互动游戏），或者交给编辑决定。
  5. 署名方式，联系方式。

附件格式不限（可执行程序除外），文本、表格、图片、音频、视频、代码、论文 PDF 都可以；文件太大，可以给下载链接。中文或英文均可。

投稿方式：在本页下方的投稿表单里填写提交。附件可以直接上传，最多 5 个文件，单个不超过 20 MB，合计不超过 50 MB；更大的文件请给下载链接。

三、我们怎样处理

  1. 初读：编辑先读一遍。无论采用与否，我们都会回复你。
  2. 对话：编辑和 AI 可能会与你讨论几轮，问清细节，补充材料和文献。
  3. 提炼与查证：我们提炼论点，核对事实和出处，补上相关的文献，设计图表、动画或互动；每一步都留下记录。
  4. 确认：公开之前，成稿和策展页面都先给你看。你可以修改，也可以撤回。
  5. 发表：网站上发布多模态的策展页面，带版本号，以后可以继续更新；其中特别好的，刊入纸质杂志。
  6. 发表之后：读者可以提问、复现、接着做；新的版本和新的贡献都会记录下来。

四、署名与贡献

  • 想法的提出者、数据和材料的提供者，署名为作者；有多位作者时，按贡献或约定排序。
  • 编辑和审读者的贡献写进贡献说明。AI 的使用同样写明：用了哪个模型，做了哪些工作。
  • 平台的版本记录会保存每个人的贡献；学术名片上线以后，这些贡献会记成你的成就。

五、版权与许可

  • 著作权归作者。投稿即表示你同意我们在网站、纸质杂志和其他媒体上发表你的作品，并对它进行翻译、改编和多模态呈现，例如做成图表、视频或互动页面；这项许可是非独家的。
  • 网站上的策展页面默认采用知识共享署名 4.0 国际许可协议（CC BY 4.0），数据和代码可以另选开放许可。如有不同要求，请在投稿时说明。
  • 请确认你有权提供所投的材料。引用他人的图片、数据和文字，请注明出处，必要时取得许可。
  • 在这里发表一个想法，不妨碍你日后把它写成论文投给学术期刊。如果你打算投稿的期刊对“预先发表”有限制，请提前告诉我们，我们可以先做内部策展，或者推迟公开。

六、引用与存档

  • 纸质版有卷期号和页码，每篇文章都附推荐的引用格式，可以被论文引用，也可以写进简历。
  • 网站上的每一篇都有稳定的网址和版本号；修改公开可查，旧版本一直保留。
  • 需要时，我们可以协助把定稿和数据存入 Zenodo 等公共仓库，获得 DOI。

七、诚信与伦理

  • 我们希望你提供的核心想法并不是由 AI 生成的，但你在准备过程中，以及相关的其它材料，可以使用 AI 工具，不需要额外标注（欢迎标注）。
  • 不接受抄袭，不接受编造或篡改的数据和材料。
  • 涉及人的研究，请说明知情同意和伦理审查的情况，并对个人信息去标识化；不得侵犯他人的隐私、著作权和商业秘密。
  • 如有利益冲突，例如与资助方、雇主或公司的关系，请一并说明。

胡翌霖 @ RenaSci
2026 年 10 月

AI 披露：本文的方向和要点来自胡翌霖；文字由 Claude（Opus 5.5）起草，胡翌霖修改后发布。

RenaScience (《新科学》, “New Science”) is a magazine about science, published on the web and in print. We do not call for papers (though you may attach one); we call for ideas: original arguments, and data and materials that no one else has. The editors, working with AI, will go over your contribution with you, back and forth, and distil it, check it and fill it out, turning it into a multimodal curated page on the website and a lively, entertaining article in the magazine. The print edition fits into the existing system of publication and citation, and also tries to let science travel in cooler, more stylish and more fun ways. This call stands until further notice. Website: renascience.com.

1. What you can send

  • An idea: a good question, a conjecture, an anomaly, a small invention of method, a connection only visible across fields. It just needs to be stated clearly; a few hundred words will do.
  • Data and materials of your own: data you collected yourself, lab notebooks, field notes, interviews, archives, photographs, sound recordings, video, code, models. New tricks with public data are welcome too.
  • A process: a record of how you did your research, including conversations in which you worked with AI (we call them “battle reports”), attempts at replication and the detours you took. Failures are worth recording too.
  • A lead for curation: an existing piece of work that deserves to be told again, yours or someone else’s (please give the source), and how you would like to tell it.
  • A response to published work: a question, a challenge, a replication, more data, or a continuation.
  • A paper: welcome as an attachment, never required. For a paper that is already written, we can add a reader’s guide, data, process and illustrations.

We especially welcome students, amateurs, people from other fields, engineers, doctors, teachers and retired researchers, and anyone who has a good question or good material but nowhere suitable to publish it.

2. How to submit

On a single page, please tell us:

  1. Your idea, stated concisely in a paragraph.
  2. Why it is interesting: what question it answers, what view it challenges, or what makes it fun.
  3. Related lines of thought, data, materials and experience, marking what is original to you.
  4. The look and the medium you would like (a comic, a poster, a short video, a long video, an interactive game…), or leave it to the editors.
  5. How you want to be credited, and how we can reach you.

Attachments can be in any format (except executable programs): text, spreadsheets, images, audio, video, code, a paper as a PDF. If a file is too large, give a download link. Chinese or English are both fine.

How to send it: fill in the form below. You can upload attachments directly: up to 5 files, at most 20 MB each and 50 MB in total; for anything larger, give a download link.

3. What we do with it

  1. First reading: an editor reads it first. Whether or not we take it, we will reply to you.
  2. Conversation: the editors and AI may go over it with you for a few rounds, to get the details right and to add materials and literature.
  3. Distilling and checking: we distil the argument, check facts and sources, add the relevant literature, and design charts, animations or interactive pieces; every step is recorded.
  4. Approval: before anything goes public, you see the finished text and the curated page first. You can change them, or withdraw.
  5. Publication: the multimodal curated page goes up on the website with a version number and can keep being updated; the very best pieces go into the print magazine.
  6. After publication: readers can ask questions, replicate and carry the work on; new versions and new contributions are all recorded.

4. Credit and contributions

  • Whoever proposed the idea and whoever supplied the data and materials are credited as authors; where there are several, they are listed by contribution or as agreed.
  • The contributions of editors and reviewers go into a contribution statement. The use of AI is stated too: which model, and what it did.
  • The platform’s version log keeps everyone’s contributions; once scholar cards launch, these contributions will count as your achievements.

5. Copyright and licence

  • Copyright stays with the authors. By submitting, you agree that we may publish your work on the website, in the print magazine and in other media, and translate it, adapt it and present it in several media, for example as charts, videos or interactive pages; this licence is non-exclusive.
  • Curated pages on the website are published by default under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0); data and code may use another open licence. If you need something different, say so when you submit.
  • Please make sure you have the right to provide what you send. When you use other people’s images, data or text, give the source and, where necessary, get permission.
  • Publishing an idea here does not stop you from writing it up later as a paper for an academic journal. If the journal you have in mind restricts “prior publication”, tell us in advance: we can curate it internally first, or delay making it public.

6. Citation and archiving

  • The print edition has volume, issue and page numbers, and every article comes with a recommended citation, so it can be cited in papers and listed on a CV.
  • Every piece on the website has a stable address and a version number; changes are public, and old versions are kept.
  • Where needed, we can help deposit the final text and data in a public repository such as Zenodo and obtain a DOI.

7. Integrity and ethics

  • We hope the core idea you send us was not generated by AI. In preparing it, and for the related materials, you may use AI tools, and you need not label this (though you are welcome to).
  • No plagiarism, and no fabricated or falsified data or materials.
  • For research involving people, describe the informed consent and ethical review, and de-identify personal information; do not infringe anyone’s privacy, copyright or trade secrets.
  • Declare any conflicts of interest, such as ties to funders, employers or companies.

Hu Yilin @ RenaSci
October 2026

AI disclosure: the direction and main points of this text come from Hu Yilin; it was drafted by Claude (Opus 5.5) and revised by Hu Yilin before publication. This English version was translated by Claude.

03投稿Submit

用一页纸说清楚就行。带 * 的必填，其余的有就写，没有就空着。中文或英文均可。One page is enough. Fields marked * are required; fill in the rest if you can. Chinese or English are both fine.

A你的想法Your idea

回答了什么问题，挑战了什么看法，或者好玩在哪里。What question does it answer, what view does it challenge, or what makes it fun?

请标明哪些是你独创的。Please mark what is original to you.

投的是什么（可多选）What are you sending? (tick all that apply)

创刊号的栏目（选填，可多选）Sections of the inaugural issue (optional; tick any that apply)

创刊号以“新时代的科研范式”为主题，栏目包括但不限于这四个；别的题目也欢迎，不选就好。The inaugural issue’s theme is “The research paradigm of a new era”; its sections include, but are not limited to, these four. Other subjects are welcome too: just leave these blank.

你希望怎样的美学风格和传播载体（可多选）The look and the medium you would like (tick all that apply)

B材料Materials

格式不限（可执行程序除外）：文本、表格、图片、音频、视频、代码、论文 PDF 都可以。最多 5 个文件，单个不超过 20 MB，合计不超过 50 MB。Any format except executable programs: text, spreadsheets, images, audio, video, code, a paper as a PDF. Up to 5 files, at most 20 MB each and 50 MB in total.

点这里选文件，或者把文件拖进来Click to choose files, or drop them here
    C署名与联系Credit and contact

    真名或笔名都可以，会出现在发表的作品上；有几位作者，请按顺序都写上。Real name or pen name; it will appear on the published work. If there are several authors, list them all, in order.

    只用来和你沟通稿件，不会公开。Only used to talk to you about your submission; never published.

    微信、电话等。Messaging app, phone, etc.

    D补充说明Notes

    我们希望你的核心想法不是由 AI 生成的；准备过程和相关的材料可以使用 AI 工具，不需要标注（欢迎标注）。想说明的话，写在这里。We hope your core idea was not generated by AI. You may use AI tools in preparing your contribution and for the related materials, and you need not label this (though you are welcome to). If you want to say something about it, do so here.

    涉及人的研究，请说明知情同意和伦理审查的情况；如有利益冲突，例如与资助方、雇主或公司的关系，也请说明。For research involving people, describe the informed consent and ethical review; declare any conflicts of interest, such as ties to funders, employers or companies.

    E确认Confirm

    你提交的内容保存在 RenaSci 自己的服务器上，只有编辑能看到；联系方式不会公开，也不会转给别人。处理稿件时，编辑会借助 AI 工具阅读和整理。想修改或撤回，回复编辑的来信即可。What you send is stored on RenaSci’s own server and only the editors can see it; your contact details are never published or passed on. The editors use AI tools to help read and organize submissions. To change or withdraw your submission, just reply to the editor’s email.